{"id":7966,"date":"2013-10-04T11:50:36","date_gmt":"2013-10-04T09:50:36","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/asal.noblogs.org\/?p=7966"},"modified":"2014-07-10T11:52:25","modified_gmt":"2014-07-10T09:52:25","slug":"interview-se-cleny-ccf","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/asal.noblogs.org\/?p=7966","title":{"rendered":"Interview se \u010dleny CCF"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify\"><em><strong><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignleft size-thumbnail wp-image-7379\" title=\"CCF\" src=\"http:\/\/alerta.cz\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/10\/CCF-150x150.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"150\" height=\"150\" \/>Na e-mail n\u00e1m p\u0159i\u0161el k p\u0159e\u010dten\u00ed a p\u0159\u00edpadn\u00e9mu zve\u0159ejn\u011bn\u00ed p\u0159eklad rozhovoru s v\u011bzn\u011bn\u00fdmi \u010dleny Conspiracy of Cells of Fire (CCF). Nemus\u00edme sice souhlasit s ka\u017edou \u010d\u00e1st\u00ed rozhovoru, p\u0159esto souhlas\u00edme s jeho zve\u0159ejn\u011bn\u00edm v pln\u00e9m zn\u011bn\u00ed a bez koment\u00e1\u0159e. V\u011b\u0159\u00edme, \u017ee rozhovor otev\u00edr\u00e1 velmi zaj\u00edmav\u00e1 t\u00e9mata a p\u0159in\u00e1\u0161\u00ed zaj\u00edmav\u00e9 podm\u011bty pro diskuzi. Doufejme, \u017ee diskuze n\u00e1sledn\u011b bude opravdu prob\u00edhat.<!--more--><\/strong><\/em><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center\">&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center\">&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center\">Kr\u00e1tk\u00e9 interview se \u010dleny CCF (Conspiracy of Cells of Fire),<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center\">kte\u0159\u00ed jsou moment\u00e1ln\u011b uv\u011bzn\u011bn\u00ed v \u0158ecku, Duben 2013<\/p>\n<div style=\"text-align: center\">(Contra Info, p\u0159ekladatelsk\u00e1 counter-information s\u00ed\u0165)<\/div>\n<div style=\"text-align: center\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000\">__________________________________<\/span><\/div>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\"><strong>Jak\u00fd je v\u00e1\u0161 pohled na squatterskou praxi?<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\">Squaty jsou nad\u010dasov\u00e9 prost\u0159edky anarchistick\u00e9 vzpoury. Soudruzi, kte\u0159\u00ed  obsad\u00ed n\u011bjakou budovu v metropoli, ve skute\u010dnosti osvobozuj\u00ed prostor  uvnit\u0159 t\u011bchto metropol\u00ed a bo\u0159\u00ed militarizovanou uniformitu urbanistick\u00e9  v\u00fdstavby. Squat m\u016f\u017ee b\u00fdt m\u00edstem nep\u0159\u00e1telstv\u00ed v\u016f\u010di nadvl\u00e1d\u011b obchodov\u00e1n\u00ed,  reklam a proti samotn\u00e9mu spekt\u00e1klu. P\u0159edstavuje oblast v\u00e1lky zam\u00ed\u0159en\u00e9  proti fa\u0161ist\u016fm, policajt\u016fm a poslu\u0161n\u00fdm ob\u010dan\u016fm. Ve skute\u010dnosti je to  prostor, kde jsou osvobozeny my\u0161lenky, emoce, tvo\u0159ivost a solidarita. V  t\u011bchto m\u00edstech je \u010das definovan\u00fd pouze dle na\u0161ich tu\u017eeb, a ne podle  taktu donucen\u00ed a rozkaz\u016f. Nicm\u00e9n\u011b squat s\u00e1m o sob\u011b nen\u00ed centrem boje.  Anarchie vlastn\u011b nem\u00e1 \u017e\u00e1dn\u00e1 takov\u00e9 centra. Skl\u00e1d\u00e1 se z kru\u017enic, kter\u00e9  jsou ve st\u00e1l\u00e9m pohybu&#8230; Pro n\u00e1s je squatting zp\u016fsobem anarchie, a ne  jeho c\u00edlem. Bohu\u017eel se n\u011bkter\u00e9 squaty v \u0158ecku prohla\u0161uj\u00ed za ostr\u016fvky  svobody a opom\u00edj\u00ed jin\u00e9 formy p\u0159\u00edm\u00e9 akce. Takto uvnit\u0159 m\u011bstsk\u00e9 pou\u0161t\u011b  okolo sebe tvo\u0159\u00ed zd\u00e1nlivou o\u00e1zu svobody. T\u00edmto se udr\u017een\u00ed pouh\u00e9  existence squatu st\u00e1v\u00e1 pro ur\u010dit\u00e9 anarchisty samotn\u00fdm c\u00edlem. V\u00fdsledkem  je, \u017ee se jednou za \u010das squate\u0159i, kte\u0159\u00ed \u010del\u00ed potenci\u00e1ln\u00edmu riziku  z\u00e1kroku proti jejich squattersk\u00e9mu projektu, rozv\u00e1\u017en\u00fdm a reformistick\u00fdm  zp\u016fsobem dohodnou a usm\u00ed\u0159\u00ed se se st\u00e1tem a m\u011bstsk\u00fdmi \u00fa\u0159ady, a to s  jedin\u00fdm c\u00edlem zachr\u00e1nit sv\u016fj prostor p\u0159ed repres\u00ed. V \u0158ecku ned\u00e1vno v  p\u0159\u00edpad\u011b soudn\u00edho vyst\u011bhov\u00e1n\u00ed squatu Villa Amalia levicov\u00e1 strana Syriza  vydala v\u016f\u010di squatu prohl\u00e1\u0161en\u00ed vyjad\u0159uj\u00edc\u00ed solid\u00e1rnost a podporu. A \u017e\u00e1dn\u00fd  squatter na tuto ud\u00e1lost nereagoval. Naopak tam existovalo velk\u00e9  mno\u017estv\u00ed tolerance a ohlasu na reformistick\u00e9 kruhy, kter\u00e9 r\u00e1dy squaty  prezentuj\u00ed jako alternativn\u00ed kulturn\u00ed centra. Pro n\u00e1s je anarchistick\u00fd  squat \u017eivouc\u00ed tov\u00e1rnou subverze, vzpoury a v\u00e1lky proti existuj\u00edc\u00edmu. Je  to pro soudruhy setk\u00e1vac\u00edm m\u00edstem ke komunikaci, v\u00fdm\u011bnu my\u0161lenek mezi  sebou, organizov\u00e1n\u00edm se a pl\u00e1nov\u00e1n\u00edm nov\u00fdch \u00fatok\u016f proti st\u00e1tu a jeho  spole\u010dnosti. Proto tedy squat nejsou \u010dty\u0159i zdi n\u011bjak\u00e9 budovy, ani jeho  dve\u0159e \u010di okna. Skl\u00e1d\u00e1 se z lid\u00ed s n\u00edm spojen\u00fdm. Skl\u00e1d\u00e1 se z jejich  tu\u017eeb, z\u00e1jm\u016f a jejich r\u016fznorod\u00fdch projekt\u016f. Nic z tohoto nen\u00ed ztraceno  kv\u016fli soudn\u00edmu vyst\u011bhov\u00e1n\u00ed \u010di demolici n\u011bjak\u00e9 budovy.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Nakolik je pro v\u00e1s d\u016fle\u017eit\u00e1 projekce zru\u0161en\u00ed pr\u00e1ce?<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\">Tyranie pr\u00e1ce a jej\u00ed etiky pron\u00e1sleduje na\u0161e skute\u010dn\u00e9 \u017eivoty. Zv\u00edt\u011bzit  nad prac\u00ed skrze negaci pr\u00e1ce je z\u00e1kladn\u00edm prvn\u00edm krokem, aby bylo  dosa\u017eeno na\u0161\u00ed individu\u00e1ln\u00ed samostatnosti. Odm\u00edt\u00e1me se st\u00e1t jenom dal\u0161\u00ed  sou\u010d\u00e1st\u00ed pasivn\u00edch polo\u017eek ve statistice v\u00fdrobn\u00edho procesu. N\u00e1mezdn\u00ed  pr\u00e1ce n\u00e1s zbavuje vlastnictv\u00ed nad na\u0161\u00ed tvo\u0159ivost\u00ed a p\u0159edstavivost\u00ed a  prom\u011b\u0148uje n\u00e1s na hloup\u00e9 sou\u010d\u00e1sti spole\u010densk\u00e9ho stroje, kter\u00fd s\u017e\u00edr\u00e1  lidsk\u00e9 maso, krev, sny a tu\u017eby. Ignorujeme p\u0159\u00edkazy nad\u0159\u00edzen\u00fdch a  hodinov\u00fdch ru\u010di\u010dek, kter\u00e9 nastavili \u0159\u00edd\u00edc\u00ed vedouc\u00ed. Pr\u00e1ce je mrtv\u00fd \u010das  na\u0161ich \u017eivot\u016f dr\u017e\u00edc\u00ed n\u00e1s jako rukojm\u00ed, kter\u00e9\u017eto n\u00e1s spout\u00e1v\u00e1 t\u00edmto  zvykem. Nicm\u00e9n\u011b tato pracovn\u00ed etika je je\u0161t\u011b v\u00edce z\u00e1ke\u0159n\u00e1 ne\u017e donucov\u00e1n\u00ed  k samotn\u00e9 pr\u00e1ci. N\u00e1mezdn\u00ed pr\u00e1ce ji\u017e nen\u00ed pova\u017eov\u00e1na za zotro\u010den\u00ed, ale  za opr\u00e1vn\u011bn\u00fd n\u00e1rok. Masy dobrovoln\u00fdch otrok\u016f jsou osln\u011bni jej\u00edmi  vlastn\u00edmi \u0159et\u011bzy. Mimoto byrokratick\u00e1 spole\u010densk\u00e1 tendence uvnit\u0159  anarchismu chyt\u00e1 sebe sama do pasti workeristickou logikou a  posv\u011bcov\u00e1n\u00edm proletari\u00e1tu. Tento sm\u011br se tak st\u00e1v\u00e1 b\u00e1zliv\u00fdm a neschopn\u00fdm  k tomu, aby h\u00e1jil a podporoval anarchistickou praxi ozbrojen\u00fdch loupe\u017e\u00ed  &#8211; vyvlast\u0148ov\u00e1n\u00ed.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\">Form\u00e1ln\u00ed-civilizovan\u00e1 anarchie d\u00e1v\u00e1 p\u0159ednost propagovat taktiku  samospr\u00e1vy b\u00eddy a \u00fatisku pomoc\u00ed samospr\u00e1vn\u00fdch odbor\u016f, nam\u00edsto navrhov\u00e1n\u00ed  skute\u010dn\u011b jasn\u00e9 praxe kr\u00e1de\u017e\u00ed a \u00fapln\u00e9 negace pr\u00e1ce. Pro n\u00e1s jsou  ozbrojen\u00e9 loupe\u017ee v\u016f\u010di finan\u010dn\u00edm chr\u00e1m\u016fm moci ned\u00edlnou sou\u010d\u00e1st\u00ed nov\u00e9  anarchistick\u00e9 m\u011bstsk\u00e9 partyz\u00e1nsk\u00e9 v\u00e1lky. Spojuj\u00ed individu\u00e1ln\u00ed osvobozen\u00ed  z despocie pr\u00e1ce s kolektivn\u00ed perspektivou odstran\u011bn\u00ed n\u00e1mezdn\u00edho  otroctv\u00ed. P\u0159esto v\u0161ak mus\u00edme b\u00fdt ohledn\u011b t\u00e9to ot\u00e1zky neust\u00e1le ostra\u017eit\u00ed.  Samotn\u00e1 bankovn\u00ed loupe\u017e nen\u00ed nic v\u00edce ne\u017e kr\u00e1sn\u00fd adrenalinov\u00fd moment.  Pokud bandit\u00e9 zkr\u00e1tka odm\u00edtaj\u00ed pracovat, ale udr\u017euj\u00ed d\u00e1le p\u0159i \u017eivot\u011b  dominantn\u00ed kulturu uvnit\u0159 sv\u00fdch hlav, pokud uct\u00edvaj\u00ed pen\u00edze a jsou  okouzleni konzumn\u00ed m\u00e1ni\u00ed, pak jejich akt m\u016f\u017ee b\u00fdt ileg\u00e1ln\u00ed, av\u0161ak  neodm\u00edt\u00e1 spole\u010densk\u00e9 mravy. Pro n\u00e1s loupe\u017e nen\u00ed aktem, jak dos\u00e1hnout  snadno bohatstv\u00ed, ale v\u011bdom\u00e1 volba jak si vz\u00edt zp\u011bt ukraden\u00fd \u010das a jak  jej osvobodit \u00fato\u010den\u00edm na fale\u0161n\u00e9 idoly, kter\u00e9 v existuj\u00edc\u00edm \u010dase  triumfuj\u00ed. Z tohoto d\u016fvodu mus\u00edme odm\u00edtnout v\u00fdmluvy, feti\u0161izovan\u00e9  d\u011blnick\u00e9 moralizov\u00e1n\u00ed a p\u0159ekonat p\u0159ek\u00e1\u017eky, abychom odstartovali  smysluplnou diskusi uvnit\u0159 anarchistick\u00fdch skupin ohledn\u011b t\u00e9matu  ozbrojen\u00e9 anarchistick\u00e9 vzpoury a zru\u0161en\u00ed pr\u00e1ce jednou prov\u017edy.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Zapadaj\u00ed \u2018spojenectv\u00ed\u2019 s levi\u010d\u00e1ck\u00fdmi slo\u017ekami podle va\u0161eho n\u00e1zoru do antifa\u0161ismu?<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\">Antifa\u0161istick\u00fd boj je pro n\u00e1s bu\u010f anarchistick\u00fd boj, nebo nen\u00ed ni\u010d\u00edm.  Rozd\u00edly a stupn\u011b odchylek, kter\u00e9 existuj\u00ed mezi anarchistick\u00fdmi a  levicov\u00fdmi kruhy, maj\u00ed z\u00e1kladn\u00ed v\u00fdznam v ka\u017ed\u00e9m teoretick\u00e9m a praktick\u00e9m  aspektu a t\u00edmto je nemo\u017en\u00e9 vytvo\u0159it momenty sbli\u017eov\u00e1n\u00ed. Pouze momenty  rozchodu a sporu. Podstata anarchistick\u00e9ho \u00fatoku je na hory vzd\u00e1lena od  pora\u017eenectv\u00ed, stav\u011bn\u00ed se do role ob\u011bti a pran\u00fd\u0159ov\u00e1n\u00ed, od rys\u016f kter\u00e9  p\u0159evl\u00e1daj\u00ed v levicov\u00fdch uskupen\u00edch. Jak\u00e9koli spojenectv\u00ed s takov\u00fdmi  levi\u010d\u00e1ck\u00fdmi sch\u00e9maty ve jm\u00e9nu antifa\u0161istick\u00e9 fronty m\u016f\u017ee vytvo\u0159it jen  obez\u0159etn\u00fd kompromis v\u016f\u010di anarchistick\u00e9mu diskurzu a praxi. Pro n\u00e1s  antifa\u0161istick\u00fd boj znamen\u00e1 p\u0159edev\u0161\u00edm b\u00fdt v ofenz\u00edv\u011b v\u016f\u010di fa\u0161ist\u016fm,  pou\u017e\u00edt proti nim jak\u00fdchkoli prost\u0159edk\u016f od z boxer\u016f a no\u017e\u016f k bomb\u00e1m a  kulk\u00e1m.<\/p>\n<p><strong>\u010c\u00edm to je, \u017ee \u010dlov\u011bk m\u00e1 pot\u0159ebu \u010dekat, aby  mohl poprv\u00e9 postoupit k \u201csebeobran\u011b\u201d (nebo \u0159e\u010deno jinak, k odvetn\u00e9mu  n\u00e1sil\u00ed) a proti\u00fatoku?<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\">V\u011b\u0159\u00edme, \u017ee ka\u017ed\u00fd \u010dlov\u011bk tvo\u0159\u00ed, pro sebe sama, cel\u00fd sv\u011bt. T\u00edmto pohledem  je v\u0161e subjektivn\u00ed. N\u00e1\u0161 \u017eivot je n\u00e1\u0161 osobn\u00ed p\u0159\u00edb\u011bh, vid\u011bn na\u0161ima  vlastn\u00edma o\u010dima. To je d\u016fvod, pro\u010d nev\u011b\u0159\u00edme v objektivn\u00ed podm\u00ednky, kter\u00e9  sest\u00e1vaj\u00ed a akceptuj\u00ed jedinou a v\u00fdhradn\u00ed objektivn\u00ed a revolu\u010dn\u00ed  skute\u010dnost. Neexistuje jedin\u00e1 realita, ale nespo\u010det realit. Neuzn\u00e1v\u00e1me  masov\u00e9 tvo\u0159en\u00ed revolu\u010dn\u00edho uv\u011bdom\u011bn\u00ed, podvratn\u00fdch zku\u0161enost\u00ed nebo  osvobozuj\u00edc\u00edch \u010din\u016f. M\u011bn\u00edme v popel tyto definovan\u00e9 posloupn\u00e9 po\u0159adn\u00edky a  sabotujeme objektivn\u00ed na\u010dasov\u00e1n\u00ed. Ka\u017ed\u00fd z n\u00e1s m\u00e1 sv\u00e9 individu\u00e1ln\u00ed  vnit\u0159n\u00ed \u201chodiny\u201d, kter\u00e9 jsou s to v\u00e9st ka\u017ed\u00e9ho k v\u00fdbuchu zac\u00edlen\u00e9mu  proti nyn\u011bj\u0161\u00edmu po\u0159\u00e1dku. Nen\u00ed t\u0159eba \u010dekat na kouzeln\u00fd okam\u017eik probuzen\u00ed  mas, ani nen\u00ed d\u016fvod k tomu, abychom ubrali plyn a sladili krok s lidsk\u00fdm  davem, kter\u00fd, jak se zd\u00e1, hluboce uct\u00edv\u00e1 sv\u00e9 vlastn\u00ed \u0159et\u011bzy. M\u011bli  bychom vyrazit do \u00fatoku v okam\u017eiku, kdy c\u00edt\u00edme nespokojenost dol\u00e9haj\u00edc\u00ed  na na\u0161e vlastn\u00ed byt\u00ed. M\u011bli bychom se odtrhnout od postoj\u016f ob\u011bti a jej\u00ed  neust\u00e1l\u00e9 obrany a za\u00fato\u010dit neomezenost\u00ed anarchie.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Co je pro v\u00e1s \u201cskute\u010dn\u00fd c\u00edl\u201d protispole\u010densk\u00e9ho proudu a skute\u010dn\u00e9ho boj proti existuj\u00edc\u00edmu?<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\">Podvratn\u00e9 anarchistick\u00e9 my\u0161len\u00ed je pravideln\u011b mrza\u010deno dikt\u00e1tem  spole\u010densk\u00e9 mor\u00e1lky a viditeln\u011b evidentn\u00edmi dogmaty. Neust\u00e1le jsme hn\u00e1ni  do p\u0159edem definovan\u00fdch dvoup\u00f3lov\u00fdch sv\u011bton\u00e1zor\u016f, kter\u00e9 se n\u00e1m nab\u00edz\u00ed &#8211;  dobro versus zlo. Despotick\u00fd st\u00e1t se zjevuje v roli zla a utla\u010dovan\u00e1  spole\u010dnost se zjevuje v roli dobra a v\u011b\u010dn\u00e9 ob\u011bti. Nicm\u00e9n\u011b moc nen\u00ed  tvo\u0159ena jednodu\u0161e z\u00e1jmovou skupinou sest\u00e1vaj\u00edc\u00ed z \u0159editel\u016f, v\u016fdc\u016f a  vrchn\u00edch velitel\u016f, ale neohrani\u010den\u00fdm spole\u010densk\u00fdm vztahem. Moc \u017eije  hlavn\u011b skrze policejn\u00ed zbran\u011b stejn\u011b jako skrz p\u0159\u00edkazy dan\u00e9 otcem uvnit\u0159  patriarch\u00e1ln\u00ed rodiny. Autorita nerozli\u0161uje mal\u00e9 a velk\u00e9 tyrany. Je  p\u0159\u00edtomna v ka\u017ed\u00e9m aspektu spole\u010densk\u00e9ho \u017eivota, od \u017eelezn\u00e9 p\u011bsti z\u00e1kon\u016f k  nejprost\u0161\u00edm gest\u016fm v osobn\u00edch vztaz\u00edch. Z tohoto d\u016fvodu pova\u017eujeme  spole\u010dnost za jasn\u00fd \u017eal\u00e1\u0159 moci. Krom\u011b toho udr\u017een\u00ed moci nesest\u00e1v\u00e1  v\u00fdhradn\u011b z represe, ale tak\u00e9 z akceptov\u00e1n\u00ed moci mnoha jedinci. To je  d\u016fvod, pro\u010d my, jako\u017eto protispole\u010den\u0161t\u00ed anarchist\u00e9, si p\u0159ejeme zni\u010dit  spole\u010dnost a jeho vl\u00e1dnouc\u00ed mor\u00e1lku. Kdy\u017e \u0159\u00edk\u00e1me \u201cv\u00e1lku spole\u010dnosti\u201d,  nem\u00e1me na mysli masov\u00e9 krveprolit\u00ed ale z\u00e1nik spole\u010densk\u00fdch norem. Mimoto  spole\u010dnost mas je d\u00edt\u011btem moci. Spole\u010densk\u00e1 soudr\u017enost je postavena na  autorit\u00e1\u0159sk\u00e9 masov\u00e9 kultu\u0159e, kter\u00e1 d\u00e1v\u00e1 na odiv ikony spekt\u00e1klu, mluv\u00ed  jazykem st\u00e1dn\u00ed propagace a reklamy, podn\u011bcuje rasovou segregaci a  vytv\u00e1\u0159\u00ed anonymn\u00ed osam\u011bl\u00fd dav. \u010ci, jak to je psan\u00e9 kdesi ohledn\u011b  m\u011bstsk\u00fdch spole\u010dnost\u00ed, \u201cNikdy jsem nevid\u011bl lidsk\u00e9 domy tak bl\u00edzko sebe &#8211;  a p\u0159esto, lid\u00e9 jsou si tak daleko a tak osam\u011bl\u00ed.\u201d Protispole\u010densk\u00fd  anarchismus bojuje proti t\u00e9to autorit\u00e1\u0159sk\u00e9 pyramid\u011b spole\u010dnosti a  prosazuje komunitu anarchistick\u00fdch uskupen\u00ed. Lidsk\u00e1 komunita, je\u017e je  opakem spole\u010dnosti, prosazuje komunikaci, tvo\u0159ivost, p\u0159edstavivost&#8230;  Spole\u010dnost zhlt\u00e1v\u00e1 unik\u00e1tnost a osobit\u00fd rys jednotlivce existuj\u00edc\u00edho v  anonymn\u00edm davu, zat\u00edmco komunita povzn\u00e1\u0161\u00ed kolektivn\u00ed soudru\u017esk\u00fd postoj  zalo\u017een\u00fd na voln\u00e9m spojen\u00ed individu\u00ed. Jedn\u00e1 se o v\u00fdraz \u017eivota podle  na\u0161ich tu\u017eeb a odstran\u011bn\u00ed pravidel.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Existuj\u00ed rozd\u00edln\u00e9 n\u00e1zory mezi v\u00e1mi jako\u017eto  samostatn\u00fdmi osobnostmi? To jest uvnit\u0159 Spiknut\u00ed ohniv\u00fdch bun\u011bk? Pokud  ano, jak je \u0159e\u0161\u00edte, abyste mohli u\u010dinit spole\u010dn\u00e1 rozhodnut\u00ed?<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\">Spiknut\u00ed ohniv\u00fdch bun\u011bk je skupina individualistick\u00fdch anarchist\u016f a  nihilist\u016f, jejich\u017e vztahy jsou zalo\u017een\u00e9 na kolektivn\u00edch touh\u00e1ch, volb\u00e1ch  a akc\u00edch. Ka\u017ed\u00fd z n\u00e1s jednotliv\u011b, ale tak\u00e9 v\u0161ichni spole\u010dn\u011b na  kolektivn\u00ed \u00farovni, prosazujeme hodnoty a charakteristiky nov\u00e9  anarchistick\u00e9 m\u011bstsk\u00e9 partyz\u00e1nsk\u00e9 v\u00e1lky. V\u011b\u0159\u00edme, \u017ee \u010dasto akce mluv\u00ed  siln\u011bji ne\u017e slova. Ba co v\u00edc, jsme lid\u00e9, kte\u0159\u00ed pro\u0161li r\u016fzn\u00fdmi cestami,  r\u016fzn\u00fdmi zku\u0161enostmi a r\u016fzn\u00fdmi spole\u010densk\u00fdmi sf\u00e9rami, ale co n\u00e1s spojuje  je z\u00e1pal pro praxi a odhodlanou bytostnou vzpouru anarchie. Nov\u00e1  anarchistick\u00e1 m\u011bstsk\u00e1 partyz\u00e1nsk\u00e1 v\u00e1lka je volba, kter\u00e1 nem\u00e1 cestu zp\u011bt.  Pokra\u010dujeme v rozv\u00edjen\u00ed se, p\u00e1l\u00edme mosty, kter\u00e9 n\u00e1s spojuj\u00ed s po\u0159\u00e1dkem a  poklidnost\u00ed sv\u011bta norm\u00e1ln\u00edho \u017eivota. Samoz\u0159ejm\u011b \u017ee i mezi n\u00e1mi  exploduj\u00ed na na\u0161ich setk\u00e1n\u00edch a v na\u0161ich debat\u00e1ch n\u011bkdy neshody, kter\u00e9  tvo\u0159\u00ed nov\u00e9 diskuse, nov\u00e9 shody a nov\u00e9 neshody. Ale je to jedin\u00fd zp\u016fsob,  jak se uskute\u010d\u0148uje v\u00fdvoj &#8211; skrze rozpory a rozkoly. Jednomyslnost masov\u00e9  shody prosp\u00edv\u00e1 uniformit\u011b, kter\u00e1 je fa\u0161istick\u00e1 pr\u00e1v\u011b tak jako nudn\u00e1,  proto\u017ee utopila neoby\u010dejn\u00e9 a unik\u00e1tn\u00ed charakteristick\u00e9 rysy na\u0161ich  individualit. Na\u0161e rozhodnut\u00ed jednat proti existuj\u00edc\u00edmu ponech\u00e1v\u00e1 m\u00edsto  pro na\u0161e neshody, kter\u00e9 budou vyj\u00e1d\u0159eny kreativn\u011b a budou sm\u011b\u0159ovat k  v\u00fdhledu na zost\u0159en\u00ed anarchistick\u00e9ho \u00faderu sp\u00ed\u0161e ne\u017e ke vzniku  charismatick\u00fdch osobnost\u00ed, kter\u00e9 jsou vta\u017eeny do stojat\u00fdch vod  sest\u00e1vaj\u00edc\u00edch z nekone\u010dn\u00fdch teoretick\u00fdch rozprav na shrom\u00e1\u017ed\u011bn\u00edch a kde  existuje nerozhodnost. Nechceme v na\u0161ich neshod\u00e1ch ka\u017ed\u00e9ho z n\u00e1s  p\u0159esv\u011bd\u010dit, ale sp\u00ed\u0161e toliko naslouchat jako mluvit. To je pro n\u00e1s  anarchistick\u00e1 komunikace, forma vyj\u00e1d\u0159en\u00ed s \u017e\u00e1dn\u00fdmi z\u00e1rukami \u010di  jistotami. Cel\u00e9 na\u0161e vztahy mezi n\u00e1mi jsou ka\u017ed\u00fdm dnem podrobov\u00e1ny  zkou\u0161ce, aby se zjistilo, zda jsou u\u017eite\u010dn\u00e9 a zdali jsou st\u00e1le na\u0161\u00ed  volbou a ne ob\u011bt\u00ed na olt\u00e1\u0159i zvyku. Notabene Spiknut\u00ed ohniv\u00fdch bun\u011bk nem\u00e1  \u017e\u00e1dn\u00fd \u00fast\u0159edn\u00ed v\u00fdbor \u010di neviditelnou ofici\u00e1ln\u00ed linii. Je setk\u00e1n\u00edm  na\u0161ich tu\u017eeb, daleko od \u201cmus\u00ed se\u201d vynucen\u00e9 jednoty. Kdy\u017e se tedy  nesouhlas ukazuje b\u00fdti siln\u011bj\u0161\u00edm ne\u017e v\u00fdhled po shod\u011b, nesouhlas se  tvo\u0159iv\u011b osvobozuje pomoc\u00ed nez\u00e1visl\u00e9 iniciativy. Koncept iniciativy pro  Spiknut\u00ed nen\u00ed jen vyhnut\u00ed se jak\u00e9mukoli ni\u010div\u00e9mu sentimentu, ale naopak  obnovuje na\u0161e vztahy sm\u011brem k \u00fapln\u00e9 tv\u016fr\u010d\u00ed hojnosti a svobod\u011b. Je to  dal\u0161\u00ed krok sm\u011brem k v\u00fdslun\u00ed anarchie&#8230;<\/p>\n<p><strong> Co je d\u016fvodem, \u017ee p\u0159isp\u00edv\u00e1te se v\u0161\u00ed svou silou z vnit\u0159ku v\u011bzen\u00ed k \u0161\u00ed\u0159en\u00ed anarchistick\u00fdch my\u0161lenek a vyd\u00e1v\u00e1n\u00ed t\u011bchto my\u0161lenek<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\">Vzhledem ke skute\u010dnosti, \u017ee podm\u00ednky na\u0161eho uv\u011bzn\u011bn\u00ed na n\u00e1s uvalily  mnoh\u00e1 omezen\u00ed a zbavily n\u00e1s stejn\u011b tak mnoha mo\u017enost\u00ed jednat \u00fato\u010dn\u011b  natolik, jak bychom cht\u011bli, pova\u017eujeme za d\u016fle\u017eit\u00e9 \u0161\u00ed\u0159it anarchistick\u00fd  \u00fato\u010dn\u00fd diskurs, kter\u00fd se s ohledem na jeho formu a obsah m\u016f\u017ee st\u00e1t  stejn\u011b ostr\u00fdm jako \u010depel b\u0159itvy. Maska anonymity n\u00e1sledkem na\u0161eho  zat\u010den\u00ed padla. Proto t\u00edm, \u017ee se p\u0159ihla\u0161ujeme k odpov\u011bdnosti za na\u0161i  \u00fa\u010dast na anarchistick\u00fdch p\u0159\u00edm\u00fdch akc\u00edch skupiny Spiknut\u00ed ohniv\u00fdch bun\u011bk,  m\u00e1me nyn\u00ed \u0161anci p\u0159edlo\u017eit a mluvit o p\u0159\u00edm\u00fdch a rozhodn\u00fdch \u00fatoc\u00edch na  existuj\u00edc\u00ed sv\u011bt. Odstartovat tak \u010dil\u00fd a pokra\u010duj\u00edc\u00ed dialog se v\u0161emi t\u011bmi  soudruhy, kte\u0159\u00ed jednaj\u00ed v nep\u0159\u00e1telsk\u00e9m duchu proti tyranii. C\u00edt\u00edme  t\u00edmto, a to navzdory omezen\u00edm, kter\u00e1 m\u00e1me jako\u017eto zajatci v rukou moci,  \u017ee p\u0159isp\u00edv\u00e1me k formov\u00e1n\u00ed ofenzivn\u00ed fronty anarchistick\u00e9 praxe \u010dern\u00e9  Internacion\u00e1ly. Na\u0161e p\u0159isp\u011bn\u00ed ke v\u0161emu tomu n\u00e1s p\u0159iv\u00e1d\u00ed \u201co krok\u201d bl\u00ed\u017ee  ke svobod\u011b, proto\u017ee du\u0161evn\u011b unik\u00e1me a na\u0161e mysli a srdce doprov\u00e1zej\u00ed  ka\u017ed\u00fd \u00fatok p\u0159\u00edm\u00e9 akce proti kultu\u0159e moci. C\u00edt\u00edme se tak v\u00edce \u017eiv\u00ed,  pevn\u011bj\u0161\u00ed a siln\u011bj\u0161\u00ed a na\u0161e mor\u00e1lka se obrozuje v my\u0161len\u00ed, \u017ee okovy  v\u011bzn\u011bn\u00ed nemohou p\u0159emoci impulsy na\u0161eho vzpurn\u00e9ho ducha. To je d\u016fvod,  pro\u010d v\u0161\u00ed na\u0161\u00ed silou p\u0159isp\u00edv\u00e1me k roz\u0161i\u0159ov\u00e1n\u00ed anarchistick\u00fdch my\u0161lenek a  publikac\u00ed.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Jak\u00e9 jsou podle v\u00e1s nejjednodu\u0161\u0161\u00ed formy, kter\u00fdmi m\u016f\u017ee b\u00fdt vyj\u00e1d\u0159ena anarchistick\u00e1 solidarita v\u011bz\u0148\u016fm soci\u00e1ln\u00ed v\u00e1lky?<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\">Jak jsme ji\u017e \u0159ekli, v\u011bzen\u00ed nen\u00ed pro anarchistu monumentem, kter\u00fd se m\u00e1  zni\u010dit, ale zast\u00e1vkou na cest\u011b, kde ka\u017ed\u00fd soudruh z\u00edsk\u00e1v\u00e1 pozn\u00e1n\u00ed sebe  sama, jako\u017e i nep\u0159\u00edtele. Anarchistick\u00e1 solidarita ru\u0161\u00ed zdi samotky a  izolace a d\u00e1v\u00e1 n\u00e1m vnit\u0159n\u00ed s\u00edlu proti na\u0161im v\u011bznitel\u016fm. Kdy\u017e je  solidarita v\u011brohodn\u00e1, pak nem\u016f\u017ee b\u00fdt ani porovn\u00e1v\u00e1na ani klasifikovan\u011b  \u0159azena. Takov\u00e1 solidarita je vzd\u00e1lena od expert\u016f a odborn\u00edk\u016f, kte\u0159\u00ed z  tohoto pojmu ud\u011blali pitomou fra\u0161ku humanismu a vykreslov\u00e1n\u00ed uv\u011bzn\u011bn\u00fdch  jako ob\u011bt\u00ed, kter\u00e1 zmrza\u010dila v\u0161echny na\u0161e \u00fato\u010dn\u00e9 charakteristick\u00e9 rysy.  Anarchistick\u00e1 solidarita se nep\u0159izp\u016fsobuje norm\u00e1m ani neomyln\u00fdm n\u00e1vod\u016fm.  Co je podstatn\u00e9 pro solidaritu, je pokra\u010dov\u00e1n\u00ed a zaost\u0159en\u00ed  anarchistick\u00e9ho \u00fatoku jak\u00fdmikoliv nevyhnuteln\u00fdmi prost\u0159edky &#8211; od rouh\u00e1n\u00ed  a \u00fato\u010dn\u00e9ho plak\u00e1tu, k \u010din\u016fm u\u017e\u00edvaj\u00edc\u00edm explozivn\u00ed za\u0159\u00edzen\u00ed \u010di st\u0159elbu  v\u016f\u010di reprezentant\u016fm existuj\u00edc\u00edho sv\u011bta. Solidarita p\u0159ed\u00e1v\u00e1 odhodlan\u00e9  poselstv\u00ed, \u017ee v\u0161echen boj pokra\u010duje a jak jin\u00ed soudruzi \u0159ekli p\u0159ed n\u00e1mi:  <strong><em>solidarita mezi anarchisty je v\u00edc ne\u017e jen slova&#8230;<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center\">&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\"><strong>Harisis Hadjimihelakis, Panagiotis Argirou, Gerasimos Tsakalos, Michalis  NikolopoulosGiorgos Polidoros, Christos Tsakalos, Damiano Bolano,  Giorgos Nikolopoulos, Olga Ekonomidou a Theofilos Mavropoulos moment\u00e1ln\u011b  dost\u00e1vaj\u00ed dopisy na tuto adresu: Dikastiki Filaki Koridallou, A Pteryga, 18110 Koridallos, At\u00e9ny, \u0158ecko<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong> T\u00e9\u017e m\u016f\u017eete poslat dopisy na:<\/strong><br \/>\n<strong> P.O. 51076, 14510 Nea Kifissia, At\u00e9ny, \u0158ecko<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong> nebo je po\u0161lete na email:<\/strong><strong> sinomosiapf<span style=\"color: #ff0000\">(zavin\u00e1\u010d)<\/span>riseup.net<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;..<\/strong><br \/>\nInterview se \u010dleny CCF v pdf stahuj <em><strong><a href=\"http:\/\/alerta.cz\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/10\/Interview_s_CCF.pdf\">ZDE<\/a><\/strong><\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Na e-mail n\u00e1m p\u0159i\u0161el k p\u0159e\u010dten\u00ed a p\u0159\u00edpadn\u00e9mu zve\u0159ejn\u011bn\u00ed p\u0159eklad rozhovoru s v\u011bzn\u011bn\u00fdmi \u010dleny Conspiracy of Cells of Fire (CCF). Nemus\u00edme sice souhlasit s ka\u017edou \u010d\u00e1st\u00ed rozhovoru, p\u0159esto souhlas\u00edme s jeho zve\u0159ejn\u011bn\u00edm v pln\u00e9m zn\u011bn\u00ed a bez koment\u00e1\u0159e. V\u011b\u0159\u00edme, \u017ee rozhovor otev\u00edr\u00e1 velmi zaj\u00edmav\u00e1 t\u00e9mata a p\u0159in\u00e1\u0161\u00ed zaj\u00edmav\u00e9 podm\u011bty pro diskuzi. Doufejme, \u017ee diskuze n\u00e1sledn\u011b [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8517,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,19,23],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-7966","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-co-se-pise-jinde","category-rozhovory-2","category-vsechny-prispevky"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/asal.noblogs.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7966","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/asal.noblogs.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/asal.noblogs.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/asal.noblogs.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/8517"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/asal.noblogs.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=7966"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/asal.noblogs.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7966\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":7967,"href":"https:\/\/asal.noblogs.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7966\/revisions\/7967"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/asal.noblogs.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=7966"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/asal.noblogs.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=7966"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/asal.noblogs.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=7966"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}