{"id":7842,"date":"2011-07-07T23:23:53","date_gmt":"2011-07-07T22:23:53","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/alerta.cz\/?p=1687"},"modified":"2011-07-07T23:23:53","modified_gmt":"2011-07-07T22:23:53","slug":"1687","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/asal.noblogs.org\/?p=7842","title":{"rendered":"Vysaje spalovna prost\u0159edky z fond\u016f EU?"},"content":{"rendered":"

\"\"<\/a><\/em><\/p>\n

P\u0159ed n\u011bkolika t\u00fddny bylo ve\u0159ejnosti ozn\u00e1meno, \u017ee ministerstvo \u017eivotn\u00edho prost\u0159ed\u00ed souhlas\u00ed s v\u00fdstavbou spalovny\u00a0komun\u00e1ln\u00edho odpadu v are\u00e1lu komo\u0159ansk\u00e9 tepl\u00e1rny United Energy. MZP 30. kv\u011btna 2011 vydalo souhlasn\u00e9 stanovisko okomentovan\u00e9 ve dvaadvaceti str\u00e1nkov\u00e9m dokumentu, ve kter\u00e9m v podstat\u011b podporuje m\u00fdty, kter\u00e9 spalovnu prezentuj\u00ed jako p\u0159ijatelnou alternativu ke skl\u00e1dkov\u00e1n\u00ed. \u00a0\u00a0<\/em><\/p>\n

Vzhledem k velmi n\u00edzk\u00e9 m\u00ed\u0159e materi\u00e1lov\u00e9 recyklace a kompostov\u00e1n\u00ed na mostecku se v\u0161ak projekt spalovny odpadu jev\u00ed jako nadbyte\u010dn\u00fd a z\u00e1rove\u0148 negativn\u011b ovliv\u0148uj\u00edc\u00ed \u017eivotn\u00ed prost\u0159ed\u00ed i kvalitu \u017eivota nejen v \u00fasteck\u00e9m kraji. Spalovna odpadu je hned po skl\u00e1dkov\u00e1n\u00ed nejhor\u0161\u00ed mo\u017enost\u00ed jak s odpady nalo\u017eit! Vzhledem k tomu, \u017ee odpadov\u00e1 politika m\u011bsta Most zdaleka nevy\u010derpala v\u0161echny mo\u017enosti prevence a v\u0161echny zp\u016fsoby zkvalitn\u011bn\u00ed recykla\u010dn\u00edho syst\u00e9mu a kompostov\u00e1n\u00ed, tak lze v\u00fdstavbu spalovny ozna\u010dit za nezodpov\u011bdn\u00fd krok, kter\u00fd skute\u010dn\u00e1 \u0159e\u0161en\u00ed odpadov\u00e9 problematiky pouze odsouv\u00e1 do pozad\u00ed.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a>Nejde v\u0161ak ale jen o to, \u017ee skute\u010dn\u00e1 \u0159e\u0161en\u00ed nejsou zohledn\u011bna a je poskytnut prostor pro rozvoj kontroverzn\u00edho projektu. Dal\u0161\u00ed existuj\u00edc\u00ed probl\u00e9m souvis\u00ed se zp\u016fsobem, jak\u00fdm se spole\u010dnost United Energy sna\u017e\u00ed pokr\u00fdt n\u00e1lady na v\u00fdstavbu a provoz spalovny. Zat\u00edm co p\u0159ed schv\u00e1len\u00edm projektu ze strany MZP, firma prezentovala spalovnu jako b\u011b\u017en\u00fd podnikatelsk\u00fd z\u00e1m\u011br financovan\u00fd z vlastn\u00edch zdroj\u016f, tak po vyd\u00e1n\u00ed souhlasn\u00e9ho stanoviska MZP, lid\u00e9 z t\u00e9 sam\u00e9 firmy hovo\u0159\u00ed o tom, \u017ee cht\u011bj\u00ed \u010d\u00e1st n\u00e1klad\u016f pokr\u00fdt z fond\u016f Evropsk\u00e9 unie. Mluv\u010d\u00ed United Energy Miloslava Ku\u010derov\u00e1 k t\u00e9to v\u011bci prohl\u00e1sila: \u201eProjekt nyn\u00ed bude pokra\u010dovat pod\u00e1n\u00edm \u017e\u00e1dosti o dotaci z prost\u0159edk\u016f EU a pod\u00e1n\u00edm \u017e\u00e1dosti o vyd\u00e1n\u00ed \u00fazemn\u00edho rozhodnut\u00ed,\u201c (1)<\/strong><\/em><\/p>\n

Z cel\u00e9 situace tedy vypl\u00fdv\u00e1, \u017ee k probl\u00e9mu v\u00fdstavby kontroverzn\u00edho projektu p\u0159ibyl i probl\u00e9m re\u00e1ln\u00e9ho rizika, \u017ee tento projekt bude financov\u00e1n z fond\u016f o kter\u00fdch n\u00e1m politick\u00e9 elity tvrd\u00ed, \u017ee maj\u00ed slou\u017eit k podpo\u0159e soci\u00e1ln\u011b prosp\u011b\u0161n\u00fdch projekt\u016f. Neprivilegovan\u00ed lid\u00e9 z dot\u010den\u00fdch oblast\u00ed, tak \u010del\u00ed dv\u011bma nespravedlnostem soub\u011b\u017en\u011b. Za prv\u00e9 m\u00e1 bez jejich svolen\u00ed b\u00fdt vystav\u011bn projekt, kter\u00fd negativn\u011b ovlivn\u00ed jejich \u017eivot a prost\u0159ed\u00ed ve kter\u00e9m \u017eij\u00ed. A za druh\u00e9 tento projekt m\u00e1 b\u00fdt financov\u00e1n ze zdroj\u016f, kter\u00e9 by mohly slou\u017eit podpo\u0159e skute\u010dn\u00fdch alternativ, co\u017e se v\u0161ak d\u011bje v nedostate\u010dn\u00e9 m\u00ed\u0159e.<\/p>\n

Ano, sem tam sice n\u011bjak\u00e1 \u010d\u00e1stka z fond\u016f EU je p\u0159id\u011blena na zkvalitn\u011bn\u00ed odpadov\u00e9 politiky. Evidentn\u011b v\u0161ak jde jen o mal\u00fd zlomek toho, co je pot\u0159eba do efektivn\u00edch opat\u0159en\u00ed vynalo\u017eit. Mosteck\u00e9 listy nap\u0159\u00edklad p\u0159ed ned\u00e1vnem informovali o tom, \u017ee z fond\u016f EU bylo vynalo\u017eeno osm milion\u016f do n\u00e1kupu v\u00edce jak t\u0159i sta kontejner\u016f na separovan\u00fd odpad v Most\u011b (plast, sklo, pap\u00edr) (2)<\/strong><\/em><\/p>\n

Po\u0159\u00edzen\u00ed nov\u00fdch kontejner\u016f je v\u0161ak jen d\u00edl\u010d\u00ed krok, za kter\u00fdm mus\u00ed n\u00e1sledovat mnoho dal\u0161\u00edch, kter\u00e9 vy\u017eaduj\u00ed spoustu prost\u0159edk\u016f. Pote\u010dou-li v\u0161ak tyto prost\u0159edky do projekt\u016f jako jsou spalovny, pak je pravd\u011bpodobn\u00e9, \u017ee tam, kde jsou skute\u010dn\u011b pot\u0159eba budou chyb\u011bt. Konkr\u00e9tn\u011b na Mostecku to lze uv\u00e9st na p\u0159\u00edkladu nedostate\u010dn\u011b o\u0161et\u0159en\u00e9 problematiky biologicky rozlo\u017eiteln\u00e9ho odpadu. P\u0159esto\u017ee bioodpad tvo\u0159\u00ed a\u017e 40 procent komun\u00e1ln\u00edho odpadu, tak v Most\u011b se jeho separace a kompostov\u00e1n\u00ed \u0159e\u0161\u00ed jen minim\u00e1ln\u011b. Obyvatelstvu je nab\u00edzena slu\u017eba svozu “dom\u00e1c\u00edho” bioodpadu z rodinn\u00fdch dom\u016f \u010di zahrad (nap\u0159. list\u00ed, tr\u00e1vy apod.). Tento odpad se pak zpracov\u00e1v\u00e1 v kompost\u00e1rn\u011b ve St\u0159imic\u00edch. V Most\u011b v\u0161ak v rodinn\u00fdch domech \u017eije mal\u00e1 \u010d\u00e1st obyvatelstva. Majorita \u017eij\u00edc\u00ed v panelov\u00fdch domech, tedy prakticky nem\u00e1 mo\u017enost bioodpad separovat a zpracovat na kompost vyu\u017eiteln\u00fd pro zem\u011bd\u011blsk\u00e9 \u00fa\u010dely. \u201ePanel\u00e1kov\u00fd\u201d biodpad pak tedy kon\u010d\u00ed ve sm\u011bsn\u00e9m odpadu a po t\u00e9 je skl\u00e1dkov\u00e1n, m\u00edsto toho aby slou\u017eil jako kvalitn\u00ed kompostovateln\u00e1 surovina.<\/p>\n

Je jasn\u00e9, \u017ee prost\u0159edky z fond\u016f EU \u010di jin\u00fdch ve\u0159ejn\u00fdch fond\u016f nen\u00ed pot\u0159eba vkl\u00e1dat do provozu spaloven, ale nap\u0159\u00edklad na z\u0159\u00edzen\u00ed kompost\u00e1ren a na zaji\u0161t\u011bn\u00ed p\u0159\u00edslu\u0161n\u00e9ho syst\u00e9mu sb\u011bru bioodpadu. V sou\u010dasnosti v\u0161ak evidentn\u011b o tom kam prost\u0159edky budou vlo\u017eeny rozhoduje za na\u0161imi z\u00e1di \u00fazk\u00e1 politicko-ekonomick\u00e1 elita a to \u010dasto proti na\u0161emu z\u00e1jmu. Nedovolme j\u00ed to a dejme j\u00ed r\u00e1zn\u011b najevo, \u017ee kdy\u017e u\u017e z n\u00e1s vy\u017ed\u00edmala prost\u0159edky do\u00a0fond\u016f, tak rozhodn\u011b nebudeme tolerovat vys\u00e1v\u00e1n\u00ed t\u011bchto prost\u0159edk\u016f kontroverzn\u00edmi projekty jako jsou spalovny.\u00a0Jedin\u011b kolektivn\u00edm tlakem zdola lze doc\u00edlit toho, aby prost\u0159edky slou\u017eili k rozvoji\u00a0skute\u010dn\u00fdch alternativ.<\/p>\n

autor textu: Luk\u00e1\u0161 Borl<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n

…………………………………….<\/strong><\/p>\n

zdroje:<\/strong><\/p>\n

(1)<\/em><\/strong> http:\/\/m.denik.cz\/mobile\/mostecky_denik\/clanek\/12562<\/a><\/p>\n

(2)<\/strong><\/em> http:\/\/listy.mesto-most.cz\/vismo\/dokumenty2.asp?id_org=100336&id=3780<\/a><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

P\u0159ed n\u011bkolika t\u00fddny bylo ve\u0159ejnosti ozn\u00e1meno, \u017ee ministerstvo \u017eivotn\u00edho prost\u0159ed\u00ed souhlas\u00ed s v\u00fdstavbou spalovny\u00a0komun\u00e1ln\u00edho odpadu v are\u00e1lu komo\u0159ansk\u00e9 tepl\u00e1rny United Energy. MZP 30. kv\u011btna 2011 vydalo souhlasn\u00e9 stanovisko okomentovan\u00e9 ve dvaadvaceti str\u00e1nkov\u00e9m dokumentu, ve kter\u00e9m v podstat\u011b podporuje m\u00fdty, kter\u00e9 spalovnu prezentuj\u00ed jako p\u0159ijatelnou alternativu ke skl\u00e1dkov\u00e1n\u00ed. \u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8517,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[10],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-7842","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-ekologie"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/asal.noblogs.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7842","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/asal.noblogs.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/asal.noblogs.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/asal.noblogs.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/8517"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/asal.noblogs.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=7842"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/asal.noblogs.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7842\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/asal.noblogs.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=7842"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/asal.noblogs.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=7842"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/asal.noblogs.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=7842"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}